Technology- Can it really save us?

Technological advancement has always played a part in human acheivement, but has also played a large role (especially post Industrial Revolution) in environmental degradation. In the past technology was hailed as being revolutionary and as an agent of change for the course of human advancement. But today when in my option most environmental degradation can be in some way contributed to technology, is it possible that technology which has been part of the problem can also be the solution?

Throughout the past century new innovations were created which revolutionized the way humans lived. These innovations were usually executed with little regard for the future effects they might have on the environment. For example, when CFCs were introduced in areasol cans and appliances, it was unknown that they would eventually lead to the destruction of the ozone layer. However in the 1980s, when the problem became aparent new technology was able to replace the chemicals in appliances and products which has led to the slow regeneration of important ozone.

Although humans have the capacity to create new technologies at rapid rates, I don't think technology will advance fast enough to save humans and the planet from catastrophe. If the drive for more eco-friendly technology had occured maybe 10-15 years ago I think there would have been a better chance to make changes in how we live our lives and how good are created. Change cannot happen overnight and unforutantely in my opinion we have gone to far down the path of destruction to rely on technology to save us.

Technology can be good or bad. It is necessary to think into the future and fully explore new technologies before mass producing them. Only through thorough insight will technology change the path of humans for the better.